Sunday, January 21, 2007

Remember, folks - always do the right thing


If there’s one film I know inside out, back to front, and upside down, it is Spike Lee’s Do the Right Thing. It’s a film I’ve watched many times. Spike Lee directed, wrote, produced, and starred in the film. It’s a film about a day in the life of a neighbourhood called Beford-Stuyvesant (known as Bed-Stuy) in Brooklyn, New York city. It’s a black neighbourhood, and race is a central theme of the film. The action is a montage of scenes in the life of the neighbourhood, all of which take place on an extremely hot summer’s day. With the oppressive heat as a backdrop, tension builds up within the community as the day unfolds, and the pressure leads to an explosion of action at the end of the film.

The film opens with footage of Rosie Perez doing some provocative, assertive dancing to the beat of Public Enemy’s Fight the Power, from their album Fear of a Black Planet. I used to love Public Enemy when I was a youngster – still do, I suppose. I’m a big fan of Spike Lee as well. I actually wrote my undergraduate dissertation on Spike Lee’s films. It wasn’t much of a dissertation to be honest – my supervisor called me an ‘underachiever’, which was pretty accurate.

A lot of the action in Do the Right Thing centres on an Italian-American business in the heart of the black community. Spike Lee’s himself plays the protagonist, Mookie, who delivers pizza’s for ‘Sal’s Famous Pizzeria’. Sal has a ‘Wall of Fame’ in the pizzeria made up of photographs of prominent Italian-Americans such as Al Pacino. One of the locals (called ‘Buggin’ Out’) takes exception to this, and demands some photos of African-Americans be put up on the wall. This leads to a series of confrontations that drive the action.

Giancarlo Esposito


Buggin’ Out is played by one of my own favourite actors, Giancarlo Esposito. He’s one of those guys who you’d recognise but probably couldn’t have identified if I hadn’t put a photo of him into this post. Off the top of my head, he’s also played Muhammed Ali’s dad in Ali (with Will Smith), and a cop in The Usual Suspects, but he’s been in loads of other stuff, usually playing character roles. He’s also been in a number of Spike Lee films. For my money, he’s one of the most versatile actors around these days. He’s played some hugely diverse roles in his career.

For me, the strength of Do the Right Thing is in its willingness to tackle identity politics head-on. I reckon it gives a very convincing picture of the complexity and diversity of racial issues, but I’m not going to try and capture that at the moment – to do justice to the film and the subject, I’d have to put a bit more time into it than I’ve got just now…

I will just say that the film partly represents a conflict between the philosophies of Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X, two prominent African-American leaders who were assassinated during the 1960s. Whereas Dr. King advocated non-violence, Malcolm X asserted the right of African-Americans in the US to rely on self-help to defend themselves against brutality. The film ends with a quote from each man, outlining his own take on whether the use of force is ever justified. Dr. King’s take on things was that violence is “immoral and impractical” as a solution, as it breeds hatred, and ensures that the cycle of violence will continue. The Malcolm X quote refers to who had the power in US society, bringing us back to the Public Enemy song that features so prominently in the film. Malcolm X believed that the problem of racism was so urgent and so systematic in the US that the black community should employ any means that were necessary to bring it to an end. Spike Lee juxtaposes these competing understandings, and challenges the viewer to reconcile them with the practical realities of Do the Right Thing.

I know exactly what side I’m on. I’ve read Malcolm X’s Autobiography three times and I find his take on things pretty compelling. I think this film is actually what brought me into contact with Malcolm X’s life and thought. I’m no pacifist, and I agree with Malcolm X that for black Americans, when the US government consistently failed to do enough to protect them, self-defence should not be described as ‘violence’ but as ‘intelligence’. Malcolm X spoke in the context of a US where white supremacist attacks on African-Americans went unpunished. This was a culture of impunity for the death of 4 black girls in the bombing of a Birmingham church, and for the assassination of Medgar Evers, an official of the NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Coloured People). Evers was immortalised in Bob Dylan’s Only a Pawn in their Game, and his assassin was only convicted in 1994 because he boasted of the murder at a KKK rally.

Do the Right Thing also stars Ossie Davis, the man who gave the eulogy at Malcolm X’s funeral, and one thing he said strikes me as quite important at this stage. He draws attention to the fact that Malcolm X had never been personally involved in any violence or disturbance. It was only a case of articulating a policy of self-reliance for a community who were the constant victim of savage attack. It seems reasonable in this context that they would take action to protect themselves and their communities.

Anyway, I got a DVD copy of Do the Right Thing at Christmas, and I’ve just watched the first 40 minutes or so of it. I’ve interrupted my viewing because I promised myself I’d try and improve my blogging frequency in 2007. Anyway, it’s a beautifully shot film, which is given a reflective edge by a lot of long takes and a pleasant jazz score by Spike’s dad, Bill Lee. In other places it becomes much more confrontational, such as in a famous scene (reprised somewhat in Lee’s The 25th Hour). A number of characters take turns addressing the camera with a string of targeted racial abuse. In turn, Puerto Rican, Italian, black, Korean and other characters vent a string of racial invectives against different groups such as Jews or Asians, such as John Turtorro’s rant against blacks which begins: “You gold-teeth, gold-chain wearing, fried chicken and biscuit-eating, monkey-ape-baboon” etc.

It’s an ensemble piece, with a lot of small roles by actors who have since become pretty well known, such as Jon Savage, Samuel L Jackson and Martin Lawrence. A lot of people reckon that all of Spike Lee’s films are about race, which is refuted by films like Summer of Sam and recently, Inside Man. He's a gifted filmmaker and shouldn't be reduced to nothing but an idealogue. But Do the Right Thing certainly has race up front and centre, and gets my vote as one of the best cinematic reflections on racial politics ever made.

15 comments:

Anonymous said...

It's been quite a number of years since I've seen it, but it's a good film. I must get a copy of it off you.

Paul said...

That would be illegal and wrong.

Anonymous said...

Yes, how could I suggest such a thing? I should be purged!

ian said...

Whereas Dr. King advocated non-violence, Malcolm X asserted the right of African-Americans in the US to rely on self-help to defend themselves against brutality.

This is a false dichotomy; Martin Luther King was as passionate an advocate of the right of African Americans to use self-help to advance their interests.

Paul said...

Yeah, but the context here is the use of force.

Malcolm X's self-help extended to the use of force in self defence - he advocated that African-Americans form rifle clubs in accordance with their constitutional rights. Dr. King was only in favour of peaceful resistance: A Christian 'turn the other cheek', 'love your enemy' approach.

ian said...

I think you are falling into the usual trap of equating non-violence with passivity.

Paul said...

Nah. You're mistaken. Despite your abrupt dismissal of what I'm saying, I'm on firm ground here Ian. I think I deserve better than those terse denunciations of my views. Good to open up a discussion, though.

I'm talking about a specific difference between MLK and MX with regard to their view of violence. The two men clearly had different views on that issue. Malcolm X advocated “vigorous action in self-defence”, while Dr. King would only advocate non-violent resistance.

You say I’m “falling into the usual trap of equating non-violence with passivity”.

Let's talk specifics. Some non-violent resistance is passive, and some is not. For example, shortly before the US and UK invaded Iraq in March 2003, five people went to Ireland’s Shannon airport and disarmed a US Navy War plane that was bound for Iraq. This was non-violent resistance, in response to the political decision to allow US military personnel and equipment travel through Ireland. This was not passive. On the other hand, in the US student anti-war movement during the Vietnam war in the 1960s (the era of Malcolm X and Dr. King), many of the ‘sit-ins’ were a relatively passive form of non-violent resistance. King was a participant in this anti-war movement, which included groups such as the SDS (Students for a Democratic Society).

However, in December 1966 the SDS adopted the slogan “from protest to resistance”. This marked a move towards a less passive strategy, while still remaining non-violent. This involved events such as the first mass burning of draft cards in April 1967. Martin Luther King, like Malcolm X, was brave enough to allow his ideas to develop over the years, and he also was moving towards a less passive approach – both with regard to this anti-war movement and also the civil rights movement. I’m planning on a full post about Dr. King in the next while, which will give more details of this change in his thinking.

At this point I should note that Malcolm X’s own political activity was peaceful, and his was in no way a passive approach. Just because he believed that violence could be justified in certain cases did not mean that he was a violent person. So I don’t know where you’re getting your idea that I think that non-violence=passivity. I don’t.

People can use whatever approach they see fit – all of them are legitimate as far as I’m concerned. I think it’s healthy to have a diversity of approaches. But I’m not a pacifist, because I believe it is a mistake to believe – as King did – that the use of force is never justified. This is why I tend to agree with Malcolm X’s understanding of violence. These are the kinds of issues that Spike Lee’s film is addressing.

Despite what Ian says, I don’t believe in closing off the debate either by ruling out violence in all cases or by dismissing non-violent action. If anyone is falling into a trap, it is him, and it is the deadliest trap of all – the trap of talking absolute bollox!!! Bring it on…

Kealo said...

Ladies, put the handbags away! Interesting debate, however.

ian said...

I wrote a huge long post but lost internet connectivity and it disappeared. This shall be my final post - though rest assured that I will deal constructively with the issue by punching the face in of one my friends who works for Google (who own Blogger).

Paul said...

You can give it to me in speech form on Friday.

"I will deal constructively with the issue by punching the face in of one my friends who works for Google (who own Blogger)"

rather him (or her?) than me...

Kealo said...

As Harry Hill would say: "FIGHT!"

ian said...

Slight return... I don't want to reopen this debate, but donkey's years ago I remember reading this pamphlet: You Can't Blow up a Social Relationship - The Anarchist case against Terrorism

Or maybe I just read the title.

Paul said...

Maybe I also only read the title...

I don't support terrorism - I am talking about self-defence. Obviously there are ongoing debates about the definition of terrorism: the issue of 'state terrorism' etc.

For me, the use of violence to terrorise is indefensible. I fully support the position in international law whereby attacks against civilians are illegal.

Rachele said...

hi there,
i ended up in your blog using the random blog tool in blogger.
your post about do the right thing caught my attention cause that movie is one of my all time favourites..
i read the whole post and found it interesting. there are many things i love in do the right thing, and in other spike lee's movies..and
i am, as well as you, really interested in the figure of malcolm x, whose political thought has been underestimated for a long time. people use to think about him as the violent one, while king has always been descripted as the peaceful one. which is totally wrong, for me.
it's good to see there's still someone on his side, if there is a side after all.
about malcolm x, i am still searching for a book my james baldwin (one day when i was lost) which was a theatrical script on malcolm x, maybe you're interested too.
then, if you happen to find it, spike lee filmed a wonderful documentary about huey p. newton, member of the black panthers, and bamboozled, of course: i really loved that movie.

bye
rachele

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.